Kidney allograft failure in the steroid-free immunosuppression era: A matched case-control study
Mohamad M Alkadi, Jim Kim, Meredith J Aull, Joseph E Schwartz, John R Lee, Anthony Watkins, Jun B Lee, Darshana M Dadhania, Surya V Seshan, David Serur, Sandip Kapur, Manikkam Suthanthiran, Choli Hartono, Thangamani Muthukumar...
We studied the causes and predictors of death-censored kidney allograft failure among 1670 kidney recipients transplanted at our center in the corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression era. As of January 1, 2012, we identified 137 recipients with allograft failure; 130 of them (cases) were matched 1-1 for recipient age, calendar year of transplant, and donor type with 130 recipients with functioning grafts (controls). Median time to allograft failure was 29 months (interquartile range: 18-51). Physician-validated and biopsy-confirmed categories of allograft failure were as follows: acute rejection (21%), glomerular disease (19%), transplant glomerulopathy (13%), interstitial fibrosis tubular atrophy (10%), and polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (7%). Graft failures were attributed to medical conditions in 21% and remained unresolved in 9%. Donor race, donor age, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, serum creatinine, urinary protein, acute cellular rejection, acute antibody-mediated rejection, BK viremia, and CMV viremia were associated with allograft failure. Independent predictors of allograft failure were acute cellular rejection (odds ratio: 18.31, 95% confidence interval: 5.28-63.45) and urine protein ≥1 g/d within the first year post-transplantation (5.85, 2.37-14.45). Serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL within the first year post-transplantation reduced the odds (0.29, 0.13-0.64) of allograft failure. Our study has identified modifiable risk factors to reduce the burden of allograft failure.
In-Hospital Cardiovascular Complications After Pancreas Transplantation in the United States from 2003 to 2012
Jim Kim, Joshua Schulman-Marcus, Anthony C Watkins, Dmitriy N Feldman, Rajesh Swaminathan, Jun B Lee, Thangamani Muthukumar, David Serur, Luke Kim, Choli Hartono...
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;120(4):682-687. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.038. Epub 2017 May 30.
ABSTRACT
Large database studies detailing the risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications after pancreas transplant has been limited, perhaps because these outcomes are not captured by transplant registries. Greater data on the incidence and risks of such outcomes could provide additional insight for referring physicians and inform potential recipients of their risk. We performed a serial, cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample, the largest publicly available inpatient database in the United States, to assess for the risk of cardiovascular complications after pancreas transplants in the United States from 2003 to 2012 (n = 13,399). Using multivariable logistic regression models, the risk of cardiovascular outcomes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPK) was compared with solitary pancreas transplants (pancreas after kidney and pancreas transplant alone [PAK + PTA]). The unadjusted prevalence of in-hospital cardiovascular complications was higher in SPK than PAK + PTA (5.5% vs 3.7%, p <0.001). After multivariable adjustment, SPK remained associated with significantly higher odds of any cardiovascular complication (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21 to 1.80, p = 0.01), and particularly stroke (OR 13.41, 95% CI 4.78 to 37.63, p <0.001), compared with PAK + PTA. However, there was no difference in perioperative mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.12, p = 0.18). In conclusion, these findings highlight the association between uremia and stroke in pancreas transplant patients, as well as the need for improved preoperative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative management, especially in those who underwent SPK.
To compare the capability of ultrasound strain and Doppler parameters in the assessment of renal allograft interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), we prospectively measured ultrasound corticomedullary strain (strain) and intra-renal artery Doppler end-diastolic velocity (EDV), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistive index (RI) in 45 renal transplant recipients before their kidney biopsies. We used 2-D speckle tracking to estimate strain, the deformation ratio of renal cortex to medulla produced by external compression using the ultrasound transducer. We also measured Doppler EDV, PSV and RI at the renal allograft inter-lobar artery. Using the Banff scoring system for renal allograft IF/TA, 45 patients were divided into the following groups: group 1 with ≤5% (n = 12) cortical IF/TA; group 2 with 6%-25% (n = 12); group 3 with 26%-50% (n = 11); and group 4 with >50% (n = 10). We performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to test the accuracy of these ultrasound parameters and duration of transplantation in determining >26% cortical IF/TA. In our results, strain was statistically significant in all paired groups (all p < 0.005) and inversely correlated with the grade of cortical IF/TA (p < 0.001). However, the difference in PSV and EDV was significant only between high-grade (>26%, including 26%-50% and >50%) and low-grade (≤25%, including <5% and 6%-25%) cortical IF/TA (p < 0.001). RI did not significantly differ in any paired group (all p > 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for strain, EDV, PSV, RI and duration of transplantation in determining >26% cortical IF/TA were 0.99, 0.94, 0.88, 0.52 and 0.92, respectively. Our results suggest that corticomedullary strain seems to be superior to Doppler parameters and duration of transplantation in assessment of renal allograft cortical IF/TA.
Circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and acute cellular rejection in kidney allograft recipients
John R Lee, Darshana Dadhania, Phyllis August, Jun B Lee, Manikkam Suthanthiran, Thangamani Muthukumar
Transplantation. 2014 Aug 15;98(3):292-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000055.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D, in addition to its established role in bone metabolism, may regulate the immune system and affect the outcome of allografts.
METHODS: We identified 351 kidney allograft recipients who had serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) measured within the first 30 days of transplantation. We evaluated the relationship between the circulating levels of 25(OH)D and acute cellular rejection (ACR), cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, BK virus nephropathy, and kidney graft function.
RESULTS: Vitamin D deficiency (circulating levels of 25[OH]D ≤20 ng/mL, defined using The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice 2011 Guideline) was observed in 216 (61.5%) of 351 kidney graft recipients. Vitamin D deficiency was more frequent in female recipients (P=0.007, Fisher exact test) and African American recipients (P<0.001) and was less frequent in preemptive kidney graft recipients (P=0.002). Biopsy-confirmed ACR was more frequent in the vitamin D-deficient group than in the sufficient group (10.2% vs. 3.7%, P=0.04). By multivariable Cox regression analysis, vitamin D deficiency was an independent risk factor for ACR (hazard ratio=3.3, P=0.02). Vitamin D deficiency was not associated with CMV disease, BK virus nephropathy, or kidney allograft function at 1 year. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 supplementation initiated within the first 90 days of transplantation was associated with a lesser incidence of ACR compared to no treatment with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (5.1% vs. 13.0%, P=0.099).
CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency is an independent risk factor for development of ACR within the first year of kidney transplantation and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 supplementation may help reduce the occurrence of ACR in the vitamin D-deficient group.
Deceased-donor kidney transplantation: improvement in long-term survival
David Serur, Stuart Saal, John Wang, John Sullivan, Roxana Bologa, Choli Hartono, Darshana Dadhania, Jun Lee, Linda M Gerber, Michael Goldstein, Sandip Kapur, William Stubenbord, Rimma Belenkaya, Marina Marin, Surya Seshan, Quanhong Ni, Daniel Levine, Thomas Parker, Kurt Stenzel, Barry Smith, Robert Riggio, Jhoong Cheigh...
BACKGROUND: Despite marked improvement in short-term renal allograft survival rates (GSR) in recent years, improvement in long-term GSR remained elusive.
METHODS: We analysed the kidney transplant experience at our centre accrued over four decades to evaluate how short-term and long-term GSR had changed and to identify risk factors affecting graft survival. The study included 1476 adult recipients of a deceased-donor kidney transplant who were transplanted between 1963 and 2006 and who had received one of five distinct immunosuppressive protocols.
RESULTS: Five-year actual GSR steadily improved over the years as immunosuppressive therapy evolved (22-86%, P < 0.001) in spite of an increasing trend in the transplantation of higher-risk donor-recipient pairings. For those whose grafts functioned for the first year, subsequent 4-year GSR (5-year conditional GSR) also improved significantly (63-92%, P < 0.001). Acute rejection and delayed graft function (DGF) were the most significant risk factors for actual graft survival, while acute rejection was the only significant risk factor for conditional GSR. Use of kidneys from expanded-criteria donors (ECD) was not a risk factor, compared to the use of standard-criteria donor kidneys for either 5-year actual or conditional GSR. There was an impressive decline in the incidence of acute rejection events (77.4-5.8%, P < 0.001). While the DGF rate had decreased, it still remained high (68.7-38.5%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant improvement in both short-term and long-term GSR of deceased-donor kidney transplants over the last four decades. These improvements are most likely related to the decreased incidence of acute rejection episodes. Minimizing acute rejection events and preventing DGF could result in further improvement in the GSR. Our experience in the judicious use of ECD kidneys suggests that this source of kidneys could be expanded further.
For your convenience, a representative from The Rogosin Institute can contact you to schedule an appointment. Please complete the necessary information.
